You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: Not true. EXCLUDING legacy costs UAW wage costs = $55/hr. Transplants = $46 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
60. Not true. EXCLUDING legacy costs UAW wage costs = $55/hr. Transplants = $46
Now $9/hr doesn't sound like a lot but a company like GM has 200,000 employees it adds up.

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/12/13/299179.html

Wages:
UAW $29
Trans $26
Wage Related:
UAW $14
Trans $9
Benefits:
UAW $12
Trans $11

Legacy Cost:
UAW $16
Trans $3
Now I don't think GM should be penalized for Legacy costs. Starting in 2010 they won't when the UAW takes over the pension & healthcare of union employees (VEBA).
So lets look at TOTAL LABOR excluding Legacy Costs

Average Wages (including 10% overtime)
UAW: $66,700
Trans: $59,800

Total Labor cost
UAW: $55/hr ($110K per employee)
Trans: $46/hr ($92K per employee)

Total labor is 23% higher. UAW workers are now 23% MORE productive than workers for Honda or Toyota.

$9/hr * 266,000 employees * 2000 hours per year = $9.5 BILLION. GM was $4.5 BILLION in the hole this year.

A $9.5 BILLION change in labor costs would move GM from losing Billions to being $4.5 BILLION on the plus side.
That is just making the wages competitive with other automotive workers = a "poor man's salary" of ONLY $59,800 on average.

If in addition to smarter labor costs GM were to cut 15%-20% of the workforce (slowly say over 5 years), close and combined plants and sell/eliminate under performing brands they could easily be profitable and competitive again.

Plus they actually would be able to pay the taxpayers back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC