You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: manufactured and intentional? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. manufactured and intentional?
i'm more than willing to believe that the extreme right is that evil, but i'm simply not going to give you that they're that smart.

the credit crunch was a result a quick downturn after an extented period of over-extending, which was facilitated by consistently low interest rates, low capital requirements, and more than a little of the euphoria that comes from financial bubbles. you can certainly argue that greenspan kept rates too low too long, but i can't accept that it was all a plot to sucker banks into lending too much so that they could later screw them into consolidating with larger banks.

it's too clever by much more than a half. if consolidation was the aim, they could have accomplished in a far more straightforward fashion.


now it certainly is true that the right wingers are great at taking full advantage of any catastrophe that comes along. shock doctrine and all. 9/11, katrina, etc., all used as excuses to funnel government money to preferred corporations headed by donors. and yes, the credit crunch is another such opportunity, and it galls that jpmorgan gets a bonanza for very little risk and bear shareholders get anything at all, and worst, taxpayers get almost no upside potential (it IS possible, but only if the bad debt performs remarkably well).

they're opportunists, not engineers.



btw, as part of the deal that upped the sale price to $10/share, jpmorgan agreed to accept the first $1 billion of losses, thus reducing the fed's exposure to a "mere" $29 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC