You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Leo Strauss was a visionary [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Leo Strauss was a visionary
He had an apolitical view and specifically taught Plato in a much different manner. For example, in Plato's Republic, Strauss believed that Plato's real voice was Thrasymachus, who is the guy who argues for power and how people exist to genuflect to power etc. To quote him "Justice is the advantage of the stronger." Strauss believe Thrasymachus represented the city and state and it's laws, and was against philosophy in general.My interpretation is that Strauss didn't necessarily believe this was right, it was simply how things existed. He also believed that real power was behind the scenes and that you could essentially take a dim-witted, likable person, make him the face of everything, get him into a position of power and use the malleable dolt as a tool. Dan Quayle and George W. Bush ring a bell? So he taught some of these concepts as his own theory of how the world worked, and you then got all these guys like Wolfie, Bill Kristol etc, who spent their lives getting their heads dunked and flushed into toilets, and they got all hard at the idea of being modern day Rasputins or some shit. These guys took academic theories then perverted them to suit their own sick ambitions.

But Strauss in many ways was right. In Republic, Socrates spoke of how leaders should be intelligent and have their eyes opened to the rest of the world, they should be prepared and enlightened. He believed people had to open their eyes and strive toward another level of thinking. Thrasymachus believed that people should just submit to the powerful, and the powerful based on their power know what is right and should get away with anything as a result. Sound familiar? He wouldn't necessarily condone what they were doing, starting this war, wrecking the economy etc. (his daughter has argued he'd be very much against the Bush Administration) But he definitely would recognize their abuse of power, and the sense of entitlement and arrogance this administration and the Republican Party and all their corporate allies seem to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC