Reply #53: Which is why the Times should have focused on THAT and not the [View All]

[Medusa]

possibility he might be having an affair with the woman, in the absence of proof. I too felt more than a little uncomfortable yesterday reading the gleeful posts of some here. What happens if something similar comes out about one of our candidates? What then? We'll be outraged that anyone so much as mentions it on the GOP side but if it's a Goper in trouble, then we have no problem at all jumping all over it. I'm not much into double standards myself. And I have to be very honest here--I read that NYT article and thought-what the fuck? It was really strangely worded. If they had the inpropriety angle they should have ran with that and ONLY with that in the absence of proof (say photos from a hotel room somewhere) regarding the sex.