51. I thought it was an interesting read, particularly Volume I.
I enjoy thought-provoking, inventive stuff like that. I don't have to get all tangled up in the fact/fiction/faith judgementalism to see whether I find some resonance or value in the work. I enjoyed "Ishmail" for similar reasons ... and "A Course In Miracles" and other things like that. I just don't feel like I have to play referee ... or fear that I'd somehow be corrupted by reading things like that. If I'm stimulated to look at different pardigms - different perspectives or facets - then I feel well-served.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
