You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: Hi, there! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Hi, there!
When I first moved up here (in '74), people here didn't really grasp the difference between their healthcare program and how it operated in the States. At that time, we actually paid into OHIP as a separate bill: $100 for family coverage, and $80 for single coverage, if memory serves.

So my Canadian friends just assumed that programs like Blue Cross were the same; you paid a hundred bucks once a year, and got the same coverage Canadians got through their provincial plans.

However, over the years, Canadians have been more than educated about the US healthcare disaster re being insured or not. Many of my friends have had personal experience with being injured or becoming ill while traveling in the States, or they have relatives who live in Florida during the winters who have had disastrous experiences.

As a result, I believe the introduction of a private health insurance system here would not be a hard sell, but rather an impossible sell. With all of the horror stories coming out of the US, and movies like Sicko, I don't think any amount of PR or spin by insurance companies can come close to convincing Canadians that private insurance is the better alternative.

There may have been a time when that was possible, but there's been too much filthy water flowing under that bridge for a while now.

The only people here who are interested in "private health care" are those like Mr. McCreith, who think that if they pay through the nose for something, they will get the bigger bang for their buck -- too dumb to realize that the ONLY bang-for-the-buck is on the insurance company's side, especially via the profits they make by denying coverage they deem expensive enough to make a dent in the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC