You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #81: FreeState [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
81.  FreeState
FreeState

When I am asked that, I say is at is it, I dont bear "holly underwear" night and day, becouse I dosen't belive it to be right to use "Holly underwear" when working in ordinary life...I am somewhat famous for beeing Blunt with my Bishop, and the stake president, when asked about this things... Have never been afraid of been blunt with either the Bishop, or the Stake President, I know the Bishop good, as he have been my home teatcher for many years, and I also know the Stake President somewhat. And they seen to respect the fact that I am blunt and not afraid of saying what I mean is right.. They know that Im a "good mormon" even tho we can disgress of someting... Or maybe we live in a country, where we respect the wiew of others, in a far different way than many does in US?.. And Im also pretty sure that the whole underwear thing, are not meant litary to be holly underwear, but rather that we as priest in our Church,should act acording to what is expected of us, to be honest, and also to keep our sexual parts, where they belong, and not playing around with it any places.. That IS an issue in the Church, becouse some are not excactly known to be that patient when it came to sex as others...

And My Bishop, and Stake President have not excactly been angry, when I told that... And as I have been writen before, I use it in Temple, but not in ordinary life, becouse I don't belive it to be right... On the other side I would say, the whole thing is way out of propotions, as holly underwear or not, are not the most IMPORTANT thing an member of LDS have to live with... And I guess some really want to make a issue about something that are not a issue... If you really want to make a issue about things, we can allways make a chat about some Fudenmental Later Days saints use of polygami, and missuse of youngsters, something that I despise in full, and if I had the posibility to do something with Warren and the FDLS I would have been doing that... But it looks like the US form of "religius freedom" are more or less given Warren, and the actions of FDLS a free pass when it came to treating their women, and their dauthers...Not to say, how their treat boys as young as 14-15 who are in "surplus" or their own, when they got on the bad hand of Warren and Co. It is so wrong in so many levels... And I have not the right words in English, to really communicate what I'm thinking about it... And the google translation equipment is rather bad to translate into english, what I can write down in my native language to express what I do feel about it...

Diclotican

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC