Reply #24: This is how they fixed it- along with a peer reviewed study of the results [View All]

[depakid]

From a book review in the British Medical Journal:

Over our dead bodies: Port Arthur and Australia's fight for gun control

On Sunday 28 April 1996, 23 year old Martin Bryant entered a tourist complex 100 km south of Hobart, Tasmania, and shot dead 35 people, wounding 18 others. The media described it as "the worst massacre by a single gunman in Australian history," although Chapman points out on page 1 that the wholesale slaughter of aborigines in the 19th century often involved far higher individual tallies.

Before this watershed tragedy, Australia's eight states and territories had different laws. In practice, they operated on or below the lowest denominator (ironically, that of Tasmania). For years, attempts to limit gun ownership had floundered in political backwaters, fobbed off by politicians cowed by vocal pro-gun lobbyists. After the massacre, obfuscation was cut through and a practical national gun agreement put in place. This included a ban on semiautomatic and pump action rifles, a compensatory buy back scheme, a register of all firearms, shooter licensing based on a "genuine reason for owning a firearm," safe storage requirements, and uniform national laws.

Myths surrounding gun control abound. "Guns don't kill people, people do" has had a successful run in the United States, but the Australian public simply did not buy this argument. I cheered when the epidemiological arsenal of sensitivity, specificity, and power was used to knock the stuffing out of arguments for a prohibited persons register; to prevent 570 assaults yet miss 30 each year in New Zealand alone would entail locking up 150 000 Kiwis.

Chapman sticks to his area of expertise and writes knowledgeably and well. He lays bare the bones of advocacy on both sides of the gun control debate and shows that understanding the opposition and getting the facts right are key to any public health change. If he ever wants a new career he could star as a general; until then I am glad he is wearing the white hat. Three years on, there have been no further Australian massacres (the previous average was one a year), and the core of the agreement remains intact. Japan, Britain, Canada, and Australia lead the world in gun control, while the United States lags a long way behind.

This book is really about the workings of the media, the use of lobbying, and the skills of advocacy. So pick a day when you are tired of dealing with the aftermath of ignored public health issues and read this ripping yarn, arm yourself with the tools it offers, and be ready to go into battle.

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7203/199

-------------

Massive Gun "Buyback" Doubled Fall In Australian Gun Deaths

The chances of gun death in Australia dropped twice as steeply after 700,000 guns were destroyed in a national firearm "buyback" and amnesty, reveals a decade long study in Injury Prevention. The study tracks the 10 years following the introduction of gun law reform in Australia between 1996 and 1998.

The legislation was prompted by a firearm massacre in Tasmania in 1996, when 35 people were killed and a further 18 seriously wounded. The reforms banned the use of semi automatic and pump action shotguns and rifles, destroying more than 700,000 weapons taken from a population of 12 million adults.

The study shows that in the 18 years before the legislation was passed, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, in which 112 people died and 52 were wounded. There have been no mass shootings since the law came into force.

The fall in the number of deaths associated with the use of firearms, including suicides, rapidly accelerated after the law took effect. The decline was at least twice as high (6%) as it had been before the reforms were introduced. In the 18 years prior to the legislation, on average, 491 people took their lives, using a firearm. After the legislation, this fell to an average of 246.

Similarly, the number of murders using guns fell from an annual average of 93 to just over 55. There was no evidence that the use of other methods to commit suicide or homicide increased.

Before the introduction of the law, the overall number of homicides not related to guns had increased 1% a year. After the law took effect, this number fell by almost 2.5% a year. And the total numbers of suicides fell by 4% after having risen annually by 2% before the introduction of the gun laws.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=59264


Full BMJ article: http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/12/6/365