You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: contrary to popular opinion most families DON'T/DIDN'T do this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. contrary to popular opinion most families DON'T/DIDN'T do this
Edited on Mon Sep-21-09 08:06 PM by pitohui
i'm old, i think prob. much older than you, and let's get real

my family didn't take naked photos of underage children nor did they think naked photos of underage children were taken for any purpose other than to humiliate said children

i knew families where this was done -- NONE of the kids were happy to have their naked butts hanging out there

i'm not saying these people deserve a felony, but they do deserve a fine and to understand that what they did was WRONG

what part of "consenting adults" do people not get?

a baby or a toddler is not able to give consent

i do not need to have my naked ass on film at age two and spread around for the laughter of adults, to NO benefit to me, only to my mental humiliation, because someone thinks that photographing me naked was "cute"

if it humiliates an adult w. an adult's understanding to be photo'd bare without permission how much more does it humiliate the child w.out choice?

we either believe in consent or we don't

most when it comes down to their own actions DON'T if we go by the posts on this board

sorry, i'm not psychic, if you're photographing nude children and photographing them embracing each other nude -- ah, you can see, i just saw one of the actual photos -- ok, i'm not saying it's equivalent to rape but it's a violation and there needs to be some punishment to send a message

a child's body is not the adult's toy to exploit in photographs

what's wrong w. waiting until the child is old enough to make up her own mind abt whether she wants to be photo'd nude? did somebody say "the baby butt is cuter than the 18 yr old butt_ == my friend, if you HONESTLY believe that, god help you because there is something wrong with you

CONSENT means something, babies and toddlers CAN'T consent

i'm not saying register them as sex offenders but yes they needed to pay a price to make them stop the activity -- these folks apparently think they are legimitately justified in spreading this type of photo around of a child too young to give consent

they think, in other words, that their child is just a possession rather than a living human being w. feelings

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC