You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq WMDs found, according to the BBC? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:11 AM
Original message
Iraq WMDs found, according to the BBC?
Advertisements [?]
Some of the critics of military intelligence (Seth Jackson, Dick Thompson) are pursuing a rather clever avenue for their arguments.
First, they demand to see documents that are secret and then claim that because they can’t see them they have been lied to. This is like demanding to see your neighbor’s medical records, and when denied, claiming that they don’t exist. Or, if they do exist, the documents are different than portrayed.
Second, WMDs have been found in different places in Iraq and reported. On July 7, 2004, the BBC reported U.S. forces seized 1.77 tons of bomb-grade uranium. On the same day, the BBC reported that materials were found which were “ideal for a radioactive dirty bomb.”
On July 2, 2004, the BBC reported that Polish General Dukaczewski was responsible for the purchase of 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas. The warheads had been buried in the desert, but a cash-hungry informant sold them to Polish troops for $5,000 each.
Bill Clinton’s chief Iraqi expert, Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution, is unequivocal, “Much remains to be done in the hunt for Iraq’s WMDs.”
Maybe what we should ask is this: Is there any secret these critics shouldn’t know about the Iraqi War? And if they knew every secret and fact, do we think they would share them with us without malice or anger to those they hold in contempt?
John Hayek
Joplin

http://www.joplinglobe.com/story.php?story_id=218112&c=96

Comment on this story:
http://www.joplinglobe.com/add_comment.php?story_id=218112
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC