You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katherine Harris x's 50!!! Voter "cleansing" off of registration DB's [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:20 AM
Original message
Katherine Harris x's 50!!! Voter "cleansing" off of registration DB's
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Oct-16-06 05:24 AM by autorank

Katherine Harris x's 50!!! Count on it. Huge disruptions. GET THIS TO YOUR DEMOCRAIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE. This is how they've aready "hacked" the election. Just read the article. Voter registration database "cleansing" sponsored by the Help America Vote Act.



http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17616&ch=infotech

Monday, October 16, 2006
Computerized Voter Registration Databases Need a Major Overhaul

Political scientist Thad Hall says federal standards
are required to prevent state electronic registration
databases from disenfranchising people.



By Katherine Bourzac

Voters can get purged from the rolls because there are no federal electronic standards for maintaining registration databases.

What Americans should be most worried about this November, say elections experts like Thad Hall, a political scientist at the University of Utah, is not that someone might hack the Diebold machine they're using to vote--but that their names might disappear from the rolls entirely. According to him, the greatest risks of fraud or disenfranchisement concern voter registration.



As Hall spells out in a report for the IBM Center for Business and Government, voter registration databases are difficult to maintain because there are no electronic standards for creating them. That makes it hard for elections officials to compare their databases with motor-vehicle registries and prison records--let alone other states' elections records.

Earlier this year, the state of Kentucky was sued by its attorney general for attempting to remove 8,000 voters from the rolls--without notifying them--based on a comparison of its database with those in Tennessee and South Carolina, in search of voters registered in multiple states. Hall says that if the state had not been sued, many voters would have been disenfranchised because of database errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC