You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: So... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
comrade snarky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. So...
A lifetime studying similar lifeforms = wild ass guess by person off the street. No one knows absolute truth BUT there are those of us who have (through hard work and study) learned enough to make something rather a bit better than that wild ass guess.

As for the environment at the time, you can tell a lot about that by what was growing in the same layers. If you find trees and tree pollens there were probably trees. If you find desert dwelling reptile bones and cacti spines there's a good chance it was a desert. If there are mollusks attached to the rocks it was probably under shallow water.

See, all things may possible. It's possible all the oxygen in the room will end up in one corner due to Brownian motion and a slow breeze outside. Unlikely but remotely possible. I don't give it much thought because I KNOW it ain't gonna happen. It's about as likely as this little guy using metal tools. The idea of a creature with a brain 100cc larger than a chimp smelting iron over 4 million years ago is so wildly, outrageously ridiculous that it tell me a lot about the way you think.

Just because you cant think of a way to figure out what an animal looked based on it's bones doesn't mean no one can. I couldn't re-create calculus from nothing on my own.

That doesn't mean no one could.


Oh and by the way, the picture has hair because if the drawing didn't some people would be going "Hey! Where's the hair!?? They were monkeys" and others would be upset at the nasty picture of the naked ugly lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC