Reply #36: I quoted them as they were correct, and you and your "oracs" were not. [View All]

[mzmolly]

The NVIC didn't change anything. They knew that some children were effected and others were not, all along. Here's a quote from 2000!

http://www.nvic.org/PressReleases/pr42700autism.htm

"Hearings in the House Government Reform Committee last August and earlier this month included testimony from parents and physicians, who presented evidence that vaccines may be a co-factor in the development of autism in some children (www.house.gov/reform/hearings/index.htm). Meetings have taken place between agencies at the National Institutes of Health and parent groups in the past few months where both NVIC and ARI have asked for a public-private collaborative autism research effort that focuses on investigating the biological mechanisms of vaccine-associated brain and immune system dysfunction leading to autism. In a letter sent to the Secretary of DHHS today, both NVIC and ARI formally asked that non-government researchers at private research institutes, including those at M.I.N.D., be involved in any large government study of the incidence or biological causes of autism, including vaccine-associated brain and immune system dysfunction leading to autism."

I'll quote them as being correct given the recent attempt to spin you way out of this recent ruling.