You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Most of the people against women bishops are also against women priests [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Most of the people against women bishops are also against women priests
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 11:33 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
However, one can avoid women priests, either by serving in one of the dioceses that doesn't accept them, or by not accepting them in one's own parish or by moving to a different parish if you're a minority holdout against women priests.

The usual "theological" justification is that Jesus chose only male disciples. My counter to that is that is that in his day, most women were married and had children by their mid teens.

Anyway, while the sexist contingent can shut their eyes and pretend that women priests don't exist, bishops are another matter entirely. In the Church of England (Brits can correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall a Yes, Prime Minister episode on the subject), bishops are appointed by the government from among candidates nominated by the Church. It's thus possible for a diocese to have to accept a bishop it doesn't want. That's why women bishops per se have become a controversial issue in the UK.

In the U.S., the system is different. Dioceses elect their own bishops from among candidates nominated at large, so in the U.S., no diocese has gotten a woman bishop unless the majority of priests and lay people accepted the idea. What set the "conservatives" off here in the U.S. was the election of a woman presiding bishop, in other words, someone they can't ignore.

So as far as I'm concerned, there's no real theological justification for objection to women bishops apart from the objection to women priests in general. Good old-fashioned sexism is certainly a part of it, but where the manure hits the ventilation device is at the point where the individual sexist can no longer avoid women clerics: with the appointment of women bishops in the U.K. and with the election of a woman presiding bishop in the U.S.

By the way, the United Church of Canada is a union of all the mainline Protestant groups (Methodists, Presbyterians, UCC) that aren't Anglican or Lutheran. Anglicans in Canada are called...Anglicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC