Reply #67: No, I took your words as stated ... [View All]

[Nihil]

... but incorrectly ascribed them to being your belief rather than
a theoretically objective post intended to provoke debate.

> You used only my title (ignoring the rest of my post) because it was
> convenient for you to create your context and twist things to get out
> of the discussion.

And you accuse *me* of twisting words?

I clearly recognised the rest of your post as I responded with
>> ... and to apparently answer that question with bible quotes
>> suggesting that deeds didn't matter.

... and, as I said above, I read your post as using the quotes and
supporting phrasing as expressing your belief rather than simply taking
an opposing view in a debate.

> How pathetic!

For someone who claimed that they didn't intend to attack me or
piss me off, your phrasing could be improved.

> Suggestion: If you can't counter people's arguments it is better
> for you not to respond at all rather than lowering yourself to
> this level.

In addition, for someone who is offering me "suggestions", you would
do well to read my posts rather than just write derisive replies.
(BTW, I don't think that your level is that low really :P )

> Is this what Christ would do?

I didn't realise He used the internet so I have no idea whether He
joins in discussions or simply ignores flame bait.
If you see him, ask him.
:hi: