You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: Actually what was said [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Actually what was said
was that as the Dem share increased more Dems seats were won in the house. And that that showed in the majority of elections excepting the elections from 1994-2004 when the trend of thirty+ years was skewed, but it still held that as Dem share of the generic poll increased so did the number of Dem house wins.

So what happened? No one even mentions fraud except for the one comment. And there is your division, and why the case has to be made for fraud in this election. I guess you just can't see that the fraud effected the vote. I can. Maybe I am smarter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC