Reply #2: "Although the model predicted the recorded vote, it failed to project the True Vote." [View All]

[Peace Patriot]

Those are very chilling words. Read them again. These polling "models" he is talking about appear to be tailoring their results to fit the "recorded" vote--obviously the voting numbers that could easily--EASILY--be a reflection of fraud (--given the takeover of our election system by private corporations with hair-raising far rightwing connections, who are tabulating all of our votes with 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code and virtually no audit/recount controls), rather than the "True Vote" (how people actually voted--not a "model," not a 'TRADE SECRET' tabulation).

This may be deliberate. (I think it is.) Or it may be just a result of the in-put into their "model" from previous fraudulent elections coinciding with the current fraudulent results. (If some of your predicters are fraudulent--not True Vote numbers--then your "model" is going to "predict" Pukes, Bushwhacks and "Blue Dogs" winning elections--and, lo and behold, they do!)

Some day, TIA is going to be recognized as one of the greatest patriots of our era.

For you, TIA: :bounce: :applause: :patriot: :applause: :bounce: