Reply #24: You've got that wrong - Clinton did side with Bush's secrecy and privilege instead of with [View All]

[blm]

accountability when Bush's roles in IranContra, BCCI and CIA drugrunning were surfacing throughout the 90s. Why anyone at DU would attach the hyped RW tripe with real matters of historic and tragic consequence is a mystery.

Reagan and Bush1 should not be in the position today of having their legacies repaired and polished. There should never have been a Bush2 administration possible.

BTW - you used to recognize Jackson Stephens' involvement in both GHWBush and Clinton's careers. I used to repost some of your Kos diaries about this strange association or linked them here at DU. Did you change your mind? If you came upon evidence that would show BCCI matters were dealt with conclusively can you please share it so we can all benefit from knowing its positive resolution? I couldn't find it in Clinton's book.