Reply #31: Or do you accept OTOH's "14.63% of Gore-2000 votes defected to Bush in 2004"? (Implausible, absurd & [View All]

[tiptoe]

would be ludicrous were there not 1.2Million innocent people dead in Iraq as a result of election fraud.)

As for some of the pollsters being "Democratic", that distinction from "Republican" means not a lot when it is "DLC Democratic."
( DLC Bill Clinton http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=149255&mesg_id=159677">"never Undid Gramm's changes" empowering Ken Lay to eventually filch $9 BIllion from Californians with the help of CA-PE#1, conspirator filth Sch*zenegger )
( DLC Bill Clinton crammed Mark Penn down Hillary's throat: "John McCain (Rad RW-controlled) are I (DLC) are the only ones qualified to be Commander in Chief. )

And "Republican" means not a lot, when it is Radical RW that has hijacked the "Republican" Party (ask Susan Eisenhower).



The Bush win scenario was based on the following assumptions:

* Kerry won just 52.90% of DNV (new voters and others who did not vote in 2000).
The 12:22am NEP reported 57% (54% in the 'forced' Final).              12:22am NEP == 13,047 random sample, 1% Margin of Error

* One in 7 (14.63%) Gore 2000 voters defected to Bush in 2004.
The 12:22am NEP reported 8% (10% in the 2pm 'forced' Final).         12:22am NEP == 13,047 random sample, 1% Margin of Error

* Just 7.20% of Bush 2000 voters defected to Kerry.
The 12:22am NEP reported 10% ( 9% in the 'forced' Final).               12:22am NEP == 13,047 random sample, 1% Margin of Error