You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's fall in the poll has nothing to do with McCain attacking him. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:38 PM
Original message
Obama's fall in the poll has nothing to do with McCain attacking him.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 10:42 PM by Drunken Irishman
I am tired of hearing this.

Obama's trip had two possible scenarios in terms of poll numbers:

1. A sustained gain that went well into August, the game changer some thought could happen with his trip.

2. A quick gain that only lasted a few days and eventually returned to the average number.

Scenario number 2 is exactly what happened.

Let's look at where Obama was the Saturday of before the start of his trip:



Prior to his trip, Obama led McCain 45-43. His trip expanded that lead to 49-40 on the Sunday after it began and then it quickly returned to...45-44, or a +1 McCain increase. Not a surprise, but how could it have happened so fast? Easy, Obama's trip was not about creating a quick bounce, rather to plant the seeds of leadership on the world stage. Obama knew this when he began, which is exactly why he said he didn't expect a huge jump in the polls. This type of bounce is essentially what a candidate sees post-convention. It's only temporary and expands Candidate A's lead over Candidate B by a significant margin, or the convention closes the gap. However, these bumps rarely ever maintain throughout the rest of the election cycle.

That's just how it is. The media won't report this, however, I had my doubts Obama would keep his significant lead over McCain. I knew there was a chance the bump was solely manufactured by the fact he was dominating the news with positive press, which often influences many voters, hence the post-convention bump rarely sustaining itself.

Obama didn't lose his 9-point lead because McCain went negative. Obama lost his 9-point lead because it was a superficial lead to begin with. The campaign knew this, I sorta knew it, though I didn't want to believe it, and so now that it's happened, it shouldn't be a surprise. Obama is right back where he was pre-trip and expect these numbers to fluctuate from 45-48% for Obama until the convention, where he'll probably build another large lead, only to watch it dwindle down to 1-2 points again. So don't be surprised if that happens, in fact expect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC