34. Fine by me. It wouldn't actually be a re-vote. It would be their first legitimate primary.
Based on my interpretation of Tim Russert's interpretation of what Dean told him, they can have a primary before June 10. They always could have made the January vote nonbinding and apportioned delegates another way. It was Bill Nelson, Karen Thurmon and other pig headed FDP members who have resisted.
I do think that the FDP should find a way to pay for it, since they previously rejected the DNCs offer of money for a caucus.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
