You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disenfranchising Hillary's Base: The Undemocratic Caucus [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Egalia Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 08:52 PM
Original message
Disenfranchising Hillary's Base: The Undemocratic Caucus
Advertisements [?]
So Senator Barack Obama won the Nebraska, Washington state, and Maine caucuses. The caucus score is now at ten for Obama and one for Hillary. No surprise there. As I noted after Iowa, the caucus system is reminiscent of 19th century voting, or a system designed long ago for and by an elite male class.

Elites males represent a significant portion of Senator Obama's base.

The caucus system is undemocratic. It disenfranchises working class voters who simply do not have the flexible schedules held by the elite class. Unlike the primary, the caucus system does not make voting available all day long to accommodate people with all types of schedules. To make matters worse, most state caucuses do not permit absentee ballot provisions.

The disenfranchised include the elderly, the disabled, people with multiple jobs, caregivers, medical personnel, police, firemen/women, members of the military, blue and pink collar workers and women.

Christopher Hitchens notes the undemocratic nature of the caucus:

It's only when you read an honest reporter like Dan Balz that you appreciate the depth and extent of the fraud that is being practiced on us all. "In a primary," as he put it, "voters quietly fill out their ballots and leave. In the caucuses, they are required to come and stay for several hours, and there are no secret ballots. In the presence of friends, neighbors and occasionally strangers, Iowa Democrats vote with their feet, by raising their hands and moving to different parts of the room to signify their support for one candidate or another. …"

Make no mistake, this system of public voting advantages the louder and more aggressive half of the species far more than it advantages women. Never mind the more obvious intimidation factor, I think we all know that there are some women who will vote for Hillary only if their husbands are not looking over their shoulders. Just as there are some working class voters who are loathe to express their preference with their bosses in the same room.

In short, the undemocratic caucus system disadvantages and disenfranchises Hillary's base. That would be working class voters, the elderly, and women.

Will the media discuss this? Or will they merely chalk up 10 out of 11 caucus wins to Obama fever?

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2008/02/disenfranchising-hillarys-base.html

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC