You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #207: Nor should you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #204
207. Nor should you
It's not that Gore did anything substantive but that his role was more substantive than preceding VPs. Cheney's role speaks for itself--we've probably had five presidents with less power. The office is developing into a catch-all. If Cheney went on a shuttle diplomacy mission nobody (except Powell) would find it that odd.

There's no electoral track record yet, but I wonder if Cheney will cause people to pay attention to the VP slot in future. I know people that thought Bush was retarded but voted for him because they assumed Cheney would be running things.

Wes may have skills as a negotiator and he's well respected abroad but the part of his resume that impreses me is his work with army training and planning... innovation in war gaming... that sort of thing. I wouldn't mind him pulling double duty as VP and intel czar --I'm assuming the CIA chief won't also be director of intel in a new admin.

Most importantly, I genuinely believe he's the best man for the VP for electoral purposes. It's often said that all Reagan needed to do in the 1980 debates was not look insane--that people were just burned out on Carter and would take any alternative as long as they didn't think he would really blow up the world.

Similarly, I think all the dems have to do is not look like they'll let the foreigners come kill us all. It doesn't matter if the electorate's rational. I'm just saying that will be the test. (Assuming people remain burned out on Bush. Funny thing about that... is Bush the first president whose re-elect numbers are always well below his approval rating? It looks like 5%-8% of the populace thinks it's unpatriotic to DISAPPROVE of the president, even if they can't wait to see the last of him.)

This is Kerry's to not lose. That's why I'm hopeful, because he's tennacious and careful and dull. Either people will be sick of Bush or they won't. If people are tired of Bush the only thing that will keep him in office is fear. Wes is good at dispelling fear. I have mixed feelings about the man but really warmed up to him the first time I heard him say that Bush's biggest problem was sowing fear. (It was radical at the time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC