You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #12: Honestly, the first part was worth the read. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

CWebster

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Feb-25-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message

12. Honestly, the first part was worth the read.

Ultimately, it was a rationalization.

A blithe acceptance of the forces that targeted Dean and ignored Kucinich make for some good rationalization of anger but all the issues become moot. Now you can rally around a candidate who, in typically Clintonian fashion, puts a disclaimer on the legitimacy of Gay relationships--marriage is reserved for between a man and a woman only. When asked, Nader responded he supported gay marriage, adding there wasn't an abundance of love and commitment in the world.

Yet Nader is the bad guy. How far we have come.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.