You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: That is a weak thesis. Why? Because JE is less liberal than JK [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. That is a weak thesis. Why? Because JE is less liberal than JK
Did you watch the ABC This Week JK and JE interviews with Stephanopoulos? Did you listen the specifics of their healthcare plans? What percent of the uninsured did JK and JE cover and how much would each one want to spend on that extra healthcare coverage? Here are the specifics as I recall them:

JE would spend less and cover fewer people. That makes him LESS LIBERAL than JK.

Nader is more liberal than either; therefore Edwards would be less likely to attract Nader voters (like me).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC