Look at the record. Absolutely I believe we would have been involved in a military action against Iraq had Gore been president. Of course, there would have been a huge difference between what we had under Bush and what would have happened under Gore. The military action would have ended up being a multi-national peace keeping force after the ouster of Hussein from power, but a military action nonetheless.
That's a far cry from a unilateral "pre-emptive" invasion, but the record shows clearly that there was a breakdown in diplomatic efforts with Iraq and some form of military action was going to be necessary.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
