|
"Kerry even proposes sending 40,000 more troops."
That is wrong. Inaccurate. JK says that instead of Nat Gaurd being in Iraq we need regular full-time troops.
" He can hardly object to the fraudulent "WMD" pretext for the whole enterprise, having unfortunately voted for it himself."
JK can, has, and will continue to object to the "fraudulent" pretext.
"Kerry wants the same, except he thinks it would be smarter, in the long run, to divvy up the loot with France and Germany."
Show me where he says that. This is mere conjecture. KJ wanted the UN involved from the get go. At least with the UN involved the problems we are facing in Iraq would be minimized and the suffering of the Iraqi people may have ended by now.
Instead of attacking KJ on this matter, why don't you go after the real culprit, B* ?
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
