You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: Can't recognize sarcasm either, huh? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Can't recognize sarcasm either, huh?
Since you had misspelled "youself" in the heading of your earlier response to me (which preceded my last comment), I thought you might recognize sarcasm. (That's why I put (sic) beside it -- that indicates an intentional or recognized error put in for effect. But maybe you don't know that.)

My entire last sentence or two was filled with errors. Errors that those of us who have been here for three years or so use as "in" jokes -- your (when you mean "you're"), moran, hugh, seriesly, !11!!11!. Those are all misspellings that we have come to associate with freepers, who tend to be notoriously poor spellers. If you had been around a while, you would know that.

I am sorry you took such offense at my comments. I am puzzled why anyone would be so obstinate about not making the very small effort to correct his mistakes, when it is so easy to do here on this web-site. On that score, even though I have three degrees, I always "spell check" my comments before I post them, 'cause it is easy to make a mistake when I am typing fast and, more often than I would like, I am sometimes wrong on the spelling of unfamiliar words. I don't feel at all upset or ashamed to do that -- again, I am thankful that DU (and every other word-processing program I am familiar with) makes it possible.

As far as the content of your OP goes, there wasn't much "there" there to begin with. That's why others here had to ask you to clarify what you were talking about.

I think Dennis Kucinich is a good man and a capable leader. I appreciate him for many reasons, not the least of which because he was one of 32 Congresspeople who stood up against accepting the Ohio electors in the stolen 2004 Presidential election. I have so much respect for him that I make the very small effort it takes to spell his name right (which you did not do, immortalizing your mistake when your OP made the "Greatest" page for some reason or other). Doesn't seem too much for me to ask other Kucinich "supporters" to do the same. Maybe it does to you.

In any event, I've spent enough time on this issue with you.

Ignorance is bliss. Until it isn't. Have a nice life.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC