Reply #7: He said he wasn't misled by the crappy intelligence, because [View All]

[AP]

it was obvioulsy crappy. He said that there was plenty of good intelligence which the media doesn't talk about (because, in my opinion, they're luring Dems into nominating a candidate who focuses on Iraq, after which they'll drop the good intelligence bomb).

He said the good evidence was compelling and he wants to know what the deal with that evidence is.

Clinton said the exact same thing. He said that there was enough good intelligence as of his last intelligence briefing in Jan 2001 to justify an up vote on IWR. He said that a president can't simply say, I chose not to trust my intelligence today, unless there's a VERY GOOD reason not to.