...but that there were all these sidebar provisions that made it OK. Then he said that the Bush administration* ignored the intent of the act, or something like that, because they implemented it in a way different than the spirit of the thing.
Bearing in mind how little I understand NAFTA, could someone in the Kerry camp (or really anyone who "gets it") explain? How could a politician with decades of experience vote for something that had language in it that would allow the Republicans to implement it the way he had to know they would want to?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
