You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: 'policies of mass murder' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. 'policies of mass murder'
yes, children die every day in thei world. it sucks, but it's reality. And can we stop it all? not a chance.

For the record, I have never claimed that Bill Clinton was infallaible, lord knows he wasn't.

please explain how your candidate, or anyone else, would have stopped all children from dying, all over the world. Some problems are intractable, some we inherit from the past, but no President can stop the civil war in Colombia. No president could have stopped the civil war tht tore the former yugoslavia to pieces, no President could have stopped the faminies in North Korea, or the use of terror to kill children and innocents. But let's remember what he did do. He forced, by sheer will, the warring factions in Ireland to listen to the Majority of the population and find peace. He was well on the way to forcing the extremists in the Israeli Occupied territories to deal with each other. His leadership helped prevent Indonesia from spiralling into Civil War after the crash of 1997-1998.

Name one conflict that George Bush has alleviated or prevented from escalating. Since he took office, all those situations, with the notable exception of Ireland, are WORSE, not better. North Korea is more unstable, thanks to Bush's poolicies. Iraq is more unstable, Colombia is unheard of. Indonesia has sunk into a repeating current of repression and violence. and don't get me started on the Occupied Territories, I think we all know about that. Shall we talk domestic policy, or can we agree that Bush is an awful President? Can we agree that the world is significantly WORSE off for having George Bush in the most powerful seat for the past three-odd years. Worse off for his policies and decisions. Would it be perfect with Al Gore as President? not a chance, we still would have gone ot war in Afganistan, since 9/11 would still have happened. We'd still have gaping holes in the economy leading from that incident and the dot-com collapse. But would we be better off? you have to answer that for yourself, but I say yes.

I don't believe in the marxist vision of a utopia rising from the ashes of capitalism. It ain't gonna happen. I will be content with margianally improving things every year, always pushing for better things. Swinging for the fences is dramatic, and makes heroes out of people, but in crunch time, the winners are those who it single after single.
Effective change is incremental, it may be unsatisfying, but in the long term, it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC