You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark is the ONLY Candidate Likely to be V.P.: He's One of The Brothers! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 06:30 PM
Original message
Clark is the ONLY Candidate Likely to be V.P.: He's One of The Brothers!
Advertisements [?]
The media keeps boosting Edwards for reasons I don’t understand.

It is now time to stop any talk of Edwards as a better V.P. choice than Clark? I don’t see how Edward’s readiness for the role of Head-Of-State and Commander-In-Chief compares with Wes Clark’s, and for the same reason that Clark could not endorse Edwards, Kerry is unlikely to consider him for V.P.

Clark has diplomatic experience. Clark’s major posts as Commander in Chief of the United States Southern Command and then as Nato Supreme Allied Commander were essentially senior diplomatic positions negotiating and implementing U.S. foreign policy objectives.

Clark has Policy Experience. Clark’s stints at Washington assignments (White House Fellow and as Special Assistant at OMB) as well as his stints in economics and Wall Street finance should provide him with some grasp of domestic policy issues.

Of Course, his record of military command is stellar. In Vietnam he left the battlefield severely wounded and received the Silver Star and a Purple Heart. His post-Vietnam awards include numerous medals and commendations including honorary Knighthoods from the British and Dutch governments, commander of the French Legion of Honor. In August 2000, President Clinton awarded General Clark with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor.

What about John Edwards? As far as I can see his experience is principally as a great liability trial lawyer who amassed a huge fortune ($50 mill) suing huge corporations. He made a ton of money an then decided to use some of it to run for the senate. Now, before completing his 1st term, he decides to run for the presidency.

What is the substantial basis of the Edward’s candidacy? It appears that his success is based mainly on his skills as a litigator – great argumentation, great presentation, great closing arguments.

This is not insignificant. But why he has been compared favorably with Wes Clark most of us in the Kerry camp really can’t understand.

Welcome Wes Clark!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC