You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: Thanks for that illuminating post [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Thanks for that illuminating post
I can't say I got that far but towards the end, I did begin to question my distrust. You made some excellent points and I would like to see Clark in our future (democratic) administration in some capacity. I am sorry that I am more mistrustful by nature- part of that comes from having lived in a country where your relatives are mowed down in the street by people you grew up with because of political differences on whom the wealth of the country should benefit (wow, just like here except for the mowing down part) and having seen the results of dirty dealings & wolves in sheeps clothing first hand.

I don't think this will be agreeable to all Clark, Kucinich or Dean supporters but last night I realized that we are the 3 grass-root campaigns and each with its own strength. If the progressives among us were to combine forces and urge our candidates to set up an exploratory committee promising to all three work together on the same ticket, we would be unbeatable & would hand the people a resounding victory against the DLC. Not everyone in the Clark and Dean campaigns are grass-roots progressives but the essence, the passion for change is in those three campaigns.

I say this at a moment where Kucinich has begun to pick up the steam he promised at the beginning of the competition because I think that the three combined progressive and populist forces would be formidable against the establishment. That's a LOT of people making a lot of noise for change. Is this workable do you think? It's unfortunately something that would have to start at the top but I don't see why it couldn't happen and don't think it would be a bad thing at all. They all balance each other out.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC