Reply #77: NO...you are the one to make the assertion that he can't speak [View All]

[bearfartinthewoods]

bescause he is proscibed by law from doing so...YOU PROVE that statement.

the order says his records are sealed. it is NOT a gag order as is used to prevent both sides in an ONGOING court case from speaking.

personally, i think the idea of sealing records in a case of this nature is an abomination....but hey....that's just me...i think if someone has been arrested for trolling chat rooms it should be public knowledge. i want to know if people like that are in the neighborhood but right now, a pedophile has to actually succeed in contacting a kid for the purposes of sex before his neighbors can be alerted to protect their kids.

if you want to give him a pass...if you want to accord him trust, go right ahead. the charges are obviously NOT baseless as the evidence was sufficent for him to accept a less than INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES conclusion to the case. a person of honor and integrity does not allow baseless charges to be lodged against himself without rising to his own defense.

which pretty much sums up the whole situation. he, the one person who best knows what thoughts he held in his heart as he waited in the parking lot is NOT screamin his innocence from the rooftops.

if you choose to do for him what he is not willing to do for himself,

it is obviously his right. just as it is my right barf when i read the words "clear the air" and "breach of public trust " coming from ritter.