You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Democrats and history, re: electability [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Democrats and history, re: electability
...first, that was a clever post. Still some debate on whether he was "elected," though. Further, when speaking of electability, certainly different standards apply to Democrats and Republicans. In the "more moral than thou" world of the GOP today, someone could be percieved by Republicans as electable if they profess a strong belief in Jeeeeesus and say all Muslims should die or be converted to Christianity.

As far as democrats, it is a more complicated road, IMO. Look at the history:

In the 13 presidential elections since World War II (excluding the 2000 election, where the actual winner is still a matter of debate),

Democrats who were generally perceived as liberal won 3 presidential elections, and lost 6. Democrats perceived as middle-of-the-road won 4 elections and lost 1.

Democratic candidates from southern states won 4 times and lost once; those from mid-western and eastern states won once and lost 6 times. (The 1948 Truman victory is not included, since Missouri is both southern and mid-western.)

No Democrat ever won the presidency without winning at least 5 southern states.

Polls consistently show that the American people have more confidence in Republicans to manage our national security

Since 1948, the fraction of voters declaring themselves Democratic has declined from about 50% to about 30%. The Republican fraction has stayed constant at about 30%.

These historical data portend a grim 2004 race for Democrats. To win, the Democratic candidate will need everything going for him (alas, there are no longer any "her" possibilities this year). The ideal candidate will have southern roots, have strong national security credentials, and will not be generally perceived as a "standard democratic liberal". He will have to draw votes from outside of the basic Democratic base, and must win back those Democrats who are concerned with the dangers of a post 9/11 world.

-- Peter Stein is a member of the Ithaca Town Board and a Professor of physics at Cornell University.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC