You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: This is idiotic [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
47. This is idiotic
Nobody knows how the election will go.

Basically, you are saying that Kerry isn't electable. But, it is hard to tell if this has such a massive impact on senate elections. There is ticket splitting which is fairly common.

In South Carolina, there are 5 republican candidate and the primary will be bloody.

In Georgia, we lost the seat already. It doesn't matter who is the nominee.

In Louisiana, it hasn't had a republican senator since Reconstruction and has been going well for democrats recently. Increasing black population is moving the state towards the left. Democratic State Treasurer John Kennedy is also running.

In South Dakota, any partisan distaste for democrats will take down Daschle. Those that will vote for him aren't going to care who the party's nominee is because they don't see him in a partisan way. Kerry won't affect outcome.

In Alaska, Knowles is leading by 4 points when there is a green in the race. This is after Kerry became the frontrunner and that hasn't changed anything yet. Alaska is heavily republican and is going to dislike any of the potential nominees.

Illinois is heavily democratic and Kerry will carry it almost certainly. There is no reason why Kerry would affect the outcome

You provide no argument for why Kerry will hurt them other than that the races are in the south and I guess Kerry being from the North will hurt democrats. But, Alaska isn't in the south so why would Clark or Edwards help there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC