You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Simple.. confounding variables [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
POed_Ex_Repub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Simple.. confounding variables
DUers need to be

Internet literate (at least to the point where they can post on the site)

News Junkies (or you wouldn't understand half the forums)

Motivated - This isn't a site you go to unless you're fairly serious about politics, I wouldn't think we get many casual observers here.



While there are a considerable number of people who fit the above, there are also a considerable number that don't. Hence polling is always going to be skewed. But hey, nobody claimed these were scientific polls did they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC