Reply #25: No, second case is unprincipled clear-eyed rejection [View All]

[krkaufman]

> That would make the first case blind, principled
> rejection and the second blind, unprincipled rejection.

No, the second case is unprincipled clear-eyed rejection. They know exactly who he is and that he would decimate Bush/Cheney; therefore, he must be stopped via "Case 1": by having the media constantly harp on his not being born a Democrat.

Let's all remember, 59% of the population voted for Reagan in 1984. We're not going to win a lot of elections with 41% of the vote -- our maximum if we reject all those who voted Republican in the past.

---

http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/U/U.S.-presidential-election,-1984.htm
1980 - 50.9%
1984 - 58.8%