Reply #70: I'm sorry you made the choice that you did with that reply [View All]

[Tom Rinaldo]

You said:

"The person who suggested that Clark should be the nominee instead of Gore already engaged in a primary war."

I wonder how many here at DU share your definition of "primary wars". Expressing a preference for one Democrat over another is not my idea of a "primary war". I've been through the real ones here at Democratic Underground and I would rather we didn't keep having them. You however intentionally dug back into the past for a hot button issue to push. I don't think that serves the interests of the person that you are supporting though you obviously differ. Alright. Check back later, I will have more to say to you. A quick scan of your post reveals many points which, let's be gentle for the moment, are subject to very different conclusions, and/or are based on disputed information. I will have some words about your logic also. I will try to keep this discussion from flaming out but you are not helping matters, in my opinion with comments like this one:

"(A 2008 Presidential Run) should be for anyone who believes that national security policy should not be a subject of political games. Clark didn't understand that."

Which is to say in other words that you think Clark believes National Security Policy should be the subject of political games. It is that type of blatant negative and distorted perception of Wesley Clark that underlies your entire "read" on what happened between 2002 and 2004 and colors what you accept as reality.

Later. I have things to do and this will take a little time...