You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #2: "No need to respond" was the response. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

satya

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jun-05-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message

2. "No need to respond" was the response.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/59000_conyers_downing_street_letter_531

The White House has ignored the letter; press secretary Scott McClellan said he had “no need to respond,” according to the New York Times.

Under this regime, the administration doesn't have to answer to Congress. Can't wait to hear their "response" to the 250,000+ people who signed Conyers' latest letter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.