15. The rule of thumb in contracts is if the language
is ambiguous, it is ambiguous on purpose, to allow each party their own interpretation. It is silly to claim that the interpretation I gave is wrong, when it is definitely NOT contradicted by the language of the agreement. I will give you 10 to 1 odds that this will be the exact interpretation that will be used to blow up the agreement if Democrats ever filibuster a judicial nominee again.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(436 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
