Why does he have to comment on a compromise that is not of his making? I thought he clearly stated his position last week in an excellent floor speech. He didn't want the judges. He didn't want the 'nukular opshun' to fall on the Senate.
That hasn't changed. But he is 1 Senator out of 100. The libs (like him) were outgunned by the Mod Squad. That's the way it goes sometimes. (They are outgunned, you know.) He will probably try to make the best of it. What choice does he have?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
