You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A note about Hillary meeting with hostile leaders... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:56 AM
Original message
A note about Hillary meeting with hostile leaders...
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 12:29 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
There's a minor irony because she will be the Secretary of State, not president.

The whole primary controversy (which was a lot of nothing on both sides, truth be told) was about the wisdom of committing to meeting without preconditions on the head of state level.

Had Hillary become President she would not have met directly with 'hostile' heads of state without preconditions. She would have limited initial meetings to people like... well, like her Secretary of State.

But as Obama's SoS she is exactly the sort of sub-presidential level person who she argued should be having such meetings, whether in the Obama administration or in her administration or John Edward's administration.

Ironically, Hillary's view ("I will not meet with them") will prevail precisely by her meeting with them. And that will be how it plays out... if anyone really high profile meets personally with Achmenijad for instance (A giant IF in any scenario) it would be her, not Obama. (Likelier is her meeting with her equivalent in the Iranian hierarchy, which would itself be a pretty big deal and much more useful than meeting with a guy with no real foreign policy powers.)

Obama is WAY to smart, cautious and protective of his credibility to step into the dark, exposing himself to international humiliation through quixotic media-frenzy meetings with no clear outcome.

The whole primary issue was symbolic, not practical... a marker of dedication to diplomacy, not actual WH event planning. It is wise to remember how hard both campaigns worked to invent foreign policy differences to argue about because there was never really a dimes worth of difference between them in policy terms going forward. (Obama always supported designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization, for instance, yet somehow that point on which he and Hillary agreed was central to a pretend primary 'disagreement' because it was in BOTH candidates' interest to have that faux disagreement at the time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC