You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My response to idiot LTTE in local paper regarding Kerry film [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Obamarama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-04 09:09 PM
Original message
My response to idiot LTTE in local paper regarding Kerry film
Advertisements [?]
In her August 17 letter to the editor, NAME HERE pondered whether anyone but her found “it very interesting that there are movies of John Kerry in battle in Vietnam?” She went on to clearly imply that the footage was faked and that the gullible masses have been seemingly duped into believing otherwise.

I’d like to set the record straight for Ms. NAME HERE, and those of her ilk who apparently swallow hook, line and sinker anything that comes out of the mouths of Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity (who’s calling who gullible?).

Kerry’s Vietnam wartime film footage was proven to be authentic in a New York Times Op/Ed piece written by Bill Keller on September 7, 2002, nearly two years before the 2004 Democratic Convention where the footage was showcased.

Keller scrutinized the footage with a skeptical eye and had this to say: “Mr. Kerry is hardly in the film, and never strikes so much as a heroic pose. These are the souvenirs of a 25-year-old guy sent to an exotic place on an otherworldly mission, who bought an 8-millimeter camera in the PX and shot a few hours of travelogue, most of it pretty boring if you didn't live through it."

Keller’s piece also reports that it was not uncommon for soldiers to take footage of their Vietnam experiences and that for Kerry to have done so is not remarkable.

I realize it must be difficult for Bush supporters to reconcile the fact that their candidate had “other priorities” during Vietnam, especially in the face of so much evidence that John Kerry valiantly served his country, but I’m confident that come November 2 they’ll have a much more bitter pill to swallow when this country elects a president worthy to be called Commander In Chief: John F. Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC