You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is critical thinking a dying art? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 09:12 AM
Original message
Is critical thinking a dying art?
Advertisements [?]
The last few months have shown this to be a real possibility. There has been a great deal of knee jerk reaction. But there always is. Except these days the knee jerk seems to have an added component, a secret ingredient: Quick Set Mind Closer.

It used to be that people formed opinions and then kept an open mind. Opinions evolved and changed. New facts came to light and that influenced opinion. Indeed, other opinions were expressed and minds considered the new opinion, rejecting it, adopting it, or further modifying it.

All after some critical thinking.

I don't see much of that anymore.

I see the same opinions rooted in knee jerk reaction flogged endlessly. Things get reduced to their most elemental. Opposing ideas are no longer heard and considered. They're just rejected out of hand in the most dismissive, vitriolic, overheated fashion possible.

Reason has been replaced with volume. Debate has morphed into push back.

"If I am louder, I am righter."

And the loudest seem to become the opinion leaders. Not for reason, but simply for volume. Bleat the loudest and the sheep will follow.

Similarly, ossified opinion makes it easy to ascribe motive. When A or B or C or D happens, it is *always* because of Z. Never mind that it may actually have been because of Y or Q or S. Conventional wisdom (ossified opinion, virtually by definition) holds that is is always because of Z and therefor it always is.

Except it isn't. But no one seems to care anymore. Or even worse, someone attempts to show that it is really because of L, but since L doesn't fit conventional wisdom (ossified opinion, virtually by definition), the person pointing it out is deemed wrong and stoned in the square of public opinion. Or shunned.

Mob mentality.

Group think.

Lock step.

Gang loyalty.

Simplification.

Blind acceptance.

Ossified thinking.

This isn't aimed at any one group or posse.

I am gone for the rest of the day. Have fun playing with my thoughts and telling me how I should think.

Or why I should respect non thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC