You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: Then what's your arguement? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. Then what's your arguement?
That Hillary is doing so well with the unions that you object to their potential influence in NV?

If the union endorsed Obama against the wishes of the members, the union leadership is going to face those members in upcomeing elections and be replaced.

You do know that a union is not a partisan political organization. Many members are actually republicans. THEY won't be caucusing for Obama, OR Hillary.

You're floundering here. You are merely trying to excuse the potential for an upcoming loss - lowering expectations, you might say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC