You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards completely wrong on lobbyists [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 08:51 AM
Original message
Edwards completely wrong on lobbyists
Advertisements [?]
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/06/lobbyists.democrats/index.html?iref=werecommend

Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton is being taken to task by her two closest rivals for accepting $400,000 in campaign contributions from Washington lobbyists.

Over the weekend, Clinton was booed by an audience of liberal bloggers in Chicago when she defended taking money from Washington lobbyists, something both Sen. Barack Obama and former Sen. John Edwards have vowed not to do.

--snip--

"A lot of these lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans. They actually do. They represent nurses, they represent social workers -- yes, they represent corporations that employ a lot of people," Clinton said.

--snip--
Edwards' response was to ask, "How many people in this room have a Washington lobbyist working for you?"

"You are not represented by Washington lobbyists. We need to cut these people off," he said, to cheers.

--------------------------------------------
Edwards was flatly wrong and played to peoples' ignorance in the process. Clinton was right - most lobbyists do represent real Americans. I know - I AM one of those lobbyists. I represent millions of American students, teachers, and education administrators. I can tell you for a fact that even among our most astute members, ones that know what it is I actually do, would barely be cognizant of the fact that they do have a lobbyist working for them, mostly due to inherent ignorance of what a lobbyist actually is in the first place.

Everyone here should do themselves a favor and google the phrase "national association". There are literally thousands of these organizations, and almost every single one of them has a lobbyist. They represent nurses, unions, counties, children, educators, broadcasters, the mentally ill, ad infinitum. You don't realize this, but there is a good chance that there's a lobbyist that represents at least one interest of every single man, woman, and child in this nation. YOU are most likely being represented by a lobbyist yourself and you don't even know it. Edwards is playing on your ignorance to make a political point.

I am a fan of neither Edwards nor Clinton. Neither is likely to get my primary vote (I currently don't have a candidate, still waiting for Gore.) I put this disclaimer to ward off those who think I'm merely bashing Edwards because I don't like him or because I'm a fan of Clinton's. This is definitely not the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC