You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #41: The first blanket refutation of the NIST WTC study was written by [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11

petgoat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jun-08-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #20

41. The first blanket refutation of the NIST WTC study was written by

Sami Yli-Karjanmaa and it's only about 300 words long.

He points out that the NIST models were truncated both in space and in
time. They cut off the model 2 floors below the impact zone, and
they cut off the time of modelling at the inception of collapse.

It is thus not satisfactory in explaining why the towers collapsed
completely and progressively and symmetrically.

http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html

Another one was written by Jim Hoffman:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.