Reply #108: your recurring claim [View All]

[OudeVanDagen]

that there were explosives is problematic, plaguepup because there was no physical evidence found for explosives of any kind known to this planet ... no residues of any kind; AND because no columns, beams, collateral framings, fenestrations, trusses, mechanical fasteners, building mechanicals show tear out or delaminations that would have to occur with the use of explosives.

A teaching tool is sending students and bomb investigators to London, Tokyo, Kansas City etc to look for residues. They find them ..... 60 years after war ... and years after bombing events. There is still residues at LaGuardia Airport in Queens from an old locker bombing. WHY can residues be found at these sites but not at WTC? Don't try to say that there's a cover-up .... there are just too many agencies and private and public investigations going on that involve thousands of people.

You have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no knowledge of collapse. WTC were two towers you described as tube within a tube. Without intact roof trusses connecting these two tubes there was motion that could not be dampened. Each tube was moving. It could not have been the static condition you have proposed. Videos show motion. Witnesses described motion. Your squibs, tech term is venting show just that - motion between the tubes, not explosives. The concrete flooring between the tubes acted just as concrete will; it has NO tensile strength ... JUST compressive. Those concrete floors can not dampen the motion between tubes ... they have no tensile strength, even with rebar they could not exhibit enough tensile strength. One engineer describes each tube acting as hands twisting ice from an ice cube tray. He's right. That energy always ... ALWAYS .... shows as venting.

FYI: Fresh videos in from Taipei (and shown on Fox) show venting during the recent earthquake. No building fell, they were able to dampen and arrest motion. Videos speak volumes ... but unluckily few collapses are recorded.