Reply #29: I'm considering what you say, but I don't think it's on target. I think [View All]

[peacetalksforall]

the ports deal is bigger than we can imagine.

First of all - it's our fault, in a way. Did we know they were the UK's to sell?
Did any of our leaders protest when we let the UK take them? Are we going to kick out China and the others who own the other ones?

The conditions existed before Rove.

This is a huge economic deal. Rove's role would be to position it. I think they completely missed the mark on the potential of the revolt. If they knew, they couldn't do much because of the secrecy.

I think the sale is due to our economic tragedy. It's not a tragedy to those who are calling the shots, because it is now obvious that they are destroying our country to bring it down to the same level as other second, going to third, country statuses.

They are doing it job by job, policy by policy, and asset by asset.

But, along the way, you get into trouble. The country needs the UAE (not by our choice) and Carlyle and others, as always, are behind it for themselves.

No one directs their anger to the real culprits.

They deliver 'situations' to Rove and let him figure out 10 ways to benefit from something they want to do. That is Rove's specialty.

George is there as the showman (because of his appeal to lemmings and Robertson and Falwell lemmings).

Dick is there to run the WH along with Don ON BEHALF OF 'the group' who are the ones really calling the shots.

If we're lucky, we could get our leaders to expose the real culprits.

And if there is any question about who that is - it's the ones who make the money.

One of the Rove jobs would be to figure out who and how he would position propaganda and messengers to convince us that it is good for us.

And in a way it may be good for us because of the pickle we are in economically because of where they have taken us so fare in the overall agenda. And the pickle they are in because of their mucked up war and their next war.